When I first came up with the deadline of Thursday February 11, 2010 for proposal submission of the 21st Century Learning Environment grant, I of course checked the Farmer’s Almanac. It said there would be sunny skies.
BUT APPARENTLY, THE ALMANAC WAS WRONG!
From the weather reports and the numerous panicky emails and phone calls I have received, it sounds like February 10th and 11th may be quite snowy this year, making it difficult for some to deliver their proposals for the grant. Although I cannot extend the deadline, I CAN say that proposals must be POSTMARKED by 4:00 pm on Thursday, February 11, 2010, rather than DELIVERED to my office in Hartford by that date and time. It is my hope that this slight change will allow those who are affected by the storm a little bit of a break, knowing that they only have to make it as far as the post office, rather than getting to Hartford. If you mail rather than deliver, please notify Carla Ghostlaw (Carla.ghostlaw@ct.gov) that “the RFP is in the mail” so that we will be waiting for it with open arms when it arrives. I’d suggest getting a receipt for your mailing, and sending it Priority Mail, Fed Ex, DHL or some other trackable method… just in case.
Please help me in getting the word out about this change, and mention how responsive the SDE has been in responding to your needs. :-)
PS. I didn’t really check the Farmer’s Almanac, but I think I will next time.
Monday, February 08, 2010
Thursday, February 04, 2010
Grant Reviewers Needed
As you are likely aware, a Request for Proposals (RFP) was recently released by the CSDE, called 21st Century Learning Environments. Many of you may even be totally engrossed in writing a proposal as I type this post! Proposals are due February 11, 2010.
Unfortunately, those proposals don't just score themselves, you know! So, I need to assemble a group of stellar educators willing to give their time and expertise to review proposals. Anyone is eligible to be a reviewer - even if you have been involved in writing a proposal - as long as you meet the following qualifications:
• are knowledgeable about ed tech (not necessarily in an ed tech job though),
• are a “smart” educator, who knows what “good” instructional techniques and principles are, and understands teaching and learning deeply.
• are available on March 10 to get together with other reviewers and decide final scores.
• believe that you can objectively review a proposal and score it against a set of specific measures.
• are willing to give your time and expertise for the good of the educational technology cause. :-)
If you've never been a reader before, this is our process: On or around February 19, each reviewer will receive a packet containing between 4-6 proposals to review and score, according to the rubric included in the RFP. Then, on March 10, all reviewers will meet at CREC in Hartford, along with the proposals they reviewed and their score sheets/comments. Reviewers will sit at tables with 4-5 other reviewers who have reviewed the same proposals and debate the merits of each proposal, discussing why each reviewer scored the various sections as he/she did, and together arriving at a collective score for each of the sections of the rubric. It will likely take approximately 45 minutes to thoroughly discuss and review each proposal as a reviewing team, so reviewers should expect to spend the entire day at CREC. Yummy refreshments and lunch will be served.
I will add that nearly everyone who has been a reviewer in the past has expressed that the experience was extremely valuable professionally.
FYI - reviewers will be asked to review proposals from outside their geographical areas, so that conflicts of interest can be avoided.
Doesn't all of this sound fun? If you are interested (or know a colleague who might be) and meet the qualifications described above, send me an email (karen.kaplan@ct.gov) with your name, email address, snail mail address (to send proposals for review), the name of the school district in which you work (if you work in a district) and the name of the RESC in which that district is located. If you have any connections to other districts with which you might have a conflict of interest, include that information too. And - let me know if you've never reviewed grants before, so that I canprepare hazing and initiation rituals be sure to group new people with more experienced grant readers when I form the reader teams.
Thank you for your consideration to become a reviewer!
Unfortunately, those proposals don't just score themselves, you know! So, I need to assemble a group of stellar educators willing to give their time and expertise to review proposals. Anyone is eligible to be a reviewer - even if you have been involved in writing a proposal - as long as you meet the following qualifications:
• are knowledgeable about ed tech (not necessarily in an ed tech job though),
• are a “smart” educator, who knows what “good” instructional techniques and principles are, and understands teaching and learning deeply.
• are available on March 10 to get together with other reviewers and decide final scores.
• believe that you can objectively review a proposal and score it against a set of specific measures.
• are willing to give your time and expertise for the good of the educational technology cause. :-)
If you've never been a reader before, this is our process: On or around February 19, each reviewer will receive a packet containing between 4-6 proposals to review and score, according to the rubric included in the RFP. Then, on March 10, all reviewers will meet at CREC in Hartford, along with the proposals they reviewed and their score sheets/comments. Reviewers will sit at tables with 4-5 other reviewers who have reviewed the same proposals and debate the merits of each proposal, discussing why each reviewer scored the various sections as he/she did, and together arriving at a collective score for each of the sections of the rubric. It will likely take approximately 45 minutes to thoroughly discuss and review each proposal as a reviewing team, so reviewers should expect to spend the entire day at CREC. Yummy refreshments and lunch will be served.
I will add that nearly everyone who has been a reviewer in the past has expressed that the experience was extremely valuable professionally.
FYI - reviewers will be asked to review proposals from outside their geographical areas, so that conflicts of interest can be avoided.
Doesn't all of this sound fun? If you are interested (or know a colleague who might be) and meet the qualifications described above, send me an email (karen.kaplan@ct.gov) with your name, email address, snail mail address (to send proposals for review), the name of the school district in which you work (if you work in a district) and the name of the RESC in which that district is located. If you have any connections to other districts with which you might have a conflict of interest, include that information too. And - let me know if you've never reviewed grants before, so that I can
Thank you for your consideration to become a reviewer!
Thursday, January 07, 2010
RFP Posted for 21st Century Learning Environments
FINALLY!!!!!
The competitive Title IID RFP for 21st Century Learning Environments has been released! You can download a copy for yourself here.
(Even if you aren't from one of those districts that are eligible to apply, I suggest you take a look - perhaps it will provide ideas for you to share with your school and district leadership.)
The deadline for submitting proposals is February 11, 2010. Good luck!
The competitive Title IID RFP for 21st Century Learning Environments has been released! You can download a copy for yourself here.
(Even if you aren't from one of those districts that are eligible to apply, I suggest you take a look - perhaps it will provide ideas for you to share with your school and district leadership.)
The deadline for submitting proposals is February 11, 2010. Good luck!
Tuesday, January 05, 2010
Update: Title IID, Race to the Top
Title IID:
Competitive Funds: It looks like the first RFP for competitive Title IID ARRA funds will be issued later this week (I’ll post a notice and link when available). The RFP is entitled “21st Century Learning Environments”. SAVE THE DATE: Bidder's Conference- January 21, 3:30-5:00 at ACES.
Entitlement Funds 2009-10: Applications for entitlement funds were due December 31, 2009, and are currently being processed. LEAs with approved applications can expect to have access to their funds through the online prepayment grant system within the next 2-3 weeks. (Your application is approved as it was submitted unless your district received - or receives by the end of the week - a request for edits or additional information.)
Entitlement Funds 2010-11: I do not expect that there will be any entitlement funds available through the Title IID program in the 2010-11 school year. Please plan your budgets accordingly.
Race To the Top:
As you are probably aware, the Department is busily finalizing the state’s Race to the Top application. Connecticut is eligible to receive up to $175 million from this federal grant program, with the majority of those funds going directly to districts. Commissioner McQuillan has included significant funds for technology integration and professional development as part of the application – so please encourage your districts to sign on and participate in our application.
Competitive Funds: It looks like the first RFP for competitive Title IID ARRA funds will be issued later this week (I’ll post a notice and link when available). The RFP is entitled “21st Century Learning Environments”. SAVE THE DATE: Bidder's Conference- January 21, 3:30-5:00 at ACES.
Entitlement Funds 2009-10: Applications for entitlement funds were due December 31, 2009, and are currently being processed. LEAs with approved applications can expect to have access to their funds through the online prepayment grant system within the next 2-3 weeks. (Your application is approved as it was submitted unless your district received - or receives by the end of the week - a request for edits or additional information.)
Entitlement Funds 2010-11: I do not expect that there will be any entitlement funds available through the Title IID program in the 2010-11 school year. Please plan your budgets accordingly.
As you are probably aware, the Department is busily finalizing the state’s Race to the Top application. Connecticut is eligible to receive up to $175 million from this federal grant program, with the majority of those funds going directly to districts. Commissioner McQuillan has included significant funds for technology integration and professional development as part of the application – so please encourage your districts to sign on and participate in our application.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
